This is a re-post of
last year's blog with updated numbers.
Congratulations!
You made it to the playoffs. It was a long hard road filled with
adversity and struggle, but you drafted and managed your way into a chance at
the Chalice. As we all know, the Head to Head matchup style can be cruel
and unforgiving. In 2005, Ben put on the greatest display of managing in
league history. His 144 wins and .666 winning percentage still stand as
the greatest display of prolonged dominance this league has seen. And
despite finishing 34.5 games ahead of his first round opponent, he went 0-2 in
the playoffs and didn't even cash. It may not be fair, but god damn it
it’s exciting. As you would expect, Ben’s experience is not typical.
In the 14 years of Yahoo! documented league history…….
The #1 seed (TJ) has gone on to win the
Chalice six times (Adrian ‘03, Colin ‘04, James ‘07, Kurt ‘12, Ben ‘13, Richie
'14). They've lost in the finals twice (Adrian ‘06, Ben ‘10). The eight finals
appearances are the most from any playoff seed. With the most championships
coming from this position, you could argue that the #1 seed has had the most
success. But an argument could be made for…
The #2 seed (RICHIE), which has finished in at least third place
(i.e. money back) in seven of the last eight seasons. While it can't match the finals success of
the #1 seed (#2 seeds are 2-4
in championship games), it holds a dominating
6-2 record in the consolation game (winners are Richie ‘04, Jarrett ‘06, Colin
‘09, Alex ‘10, TJ ‘11, James ‘13). Overall,
more than 80% of the teams that earned a bye have finished in the money, which
is a figure that declines sharply once you hit…
The #3 seed (JARRETT), where 50% have cashed. #3 seeds are the only seed aside from the
#1 seed with a winning record in the title game, winning three of their four
appearances (Ben ‘06, Drew ’09, Jarrett ‘16). The numbers diminish again when
you sink to…
The #4 seed (COLIN), who has finished in the money 43% of the time.
This seed represents the most non-bye championship appearances (five);
two winners (Alex ‘05, Kurt ‘11) and three losers (Richie ‘08, James ‘09, Kurt
'15). #4 seeds have not fared well in the consolation game capturing just
one win (Colin '14) against four losses (Richie ‘03, TJ ‘10, Alex ’13, James
‘16). Add it all up and the #4 seed is 3-7 in money games. The seed you
must avoid at all costs is…………..
The #5 seed (ALEX), who’s 7% cash rate makes it by far and away the least lucrative
playoff seed in history. With zero trips to the finals and one third
place finish (Kurt ‘07), there’s no doubt this is the cement-shoe seed.
#5 seeds are 4-10 in the first round of the playoffs and 1-8 in their
last nine, meaning more than two-thirds of their seasons end in the dreaded,
pointless double consolation game. It’s amazing how much better it’s been to
be…………..
The #6 seed (TIM), who’s one championship (James ‘10) and 36%
cash rate is far more attractive. Sure, they've taken their lumps;
they've come in last more than any other seed (57%), but with three
second-place finishes (Alex ‘04, Ben ‘11, Ben '14) and a cash back third (Colin
'03), it’s not all that bad. Plus, you’re automatically the Cinderella
story that everyone roots for. Sot you got that goin’ for you, which is
nice. But of course if you can’t read, there’s always this:
1st
|
2nd
|
3rd
|
4th
|
5th
|
6th
|
$$$
|
Share
|
|
1 Seed
|
43%
|
21%
|
7%
|
29%
|
NA
|
NA
|
71%
|
33%
|
2 Seed
|
14%
|
29%
|
50%
|
7%
|
NA
|
NA
|
93%
|
22%
|
3 Seed
|
21%
|
7%
|
21%
|
14%
|
29%
|
7%
|
50%
|
17%
|
4 Seed
|
14%
|
21%
|
7%
|
29%
|
21%
|
7%
|
43%
|
16%
|
5 Seed
|
0%
|
0%
|
7%
|
21%
|
43%
|
29%
|
7%
|
1%
|
6 Seed
|
7%
|
21%
|
7%
|
0%
|
7%
|
57%
|
36%
|
11%
|
No comments:
Post a Comment